3.01: Overview

  US Judicial System (33k)

   

   

3.02: After-acquired Title Doctrine

  MI Ct of Appeals Opinion. Richards v Tibaldi (128k).

   

   

3.03: Appraisals

  MI Ct of Appeals Opinion. Seit-Olsen v Reliance Appraisals LLC (113k).

   

   

3.04: Easements

  MI Ct of Appeals Opinion. Ross v Wells. (87k).

   

   

3.05: Eminent Domain/Inverse Condemnation

  MI Supreme Ct Opinion. Spiek v Dep't of Transportation (48k).
  MI Ct of Appeals Opinion. Mich DOT v Tomkins (210k).

UPDATE! Upon appeal, the Michigan Supreme Court reversed this ruling in a decision (204k) dated June 11, 2008.

  

   

3.06: Interference with a Business Relationship

  FL District Ct Opinion. Walters v Blankenship (34k).

   

   

3.07: Listings and Leases

  MI Ct of Appeals Opinion. Real Estate One v Heller (100k).

   

   

3.08: Mortgage Pre-approvals

  IL Appeals Ct Opinion. Suburban 1 Inc v GHS Mortgage LLC (25k).

   

   

3.09: NAR Code of Ethics

  NAR Code of Ethics (112k)
  US 7th Cir Ct of Appeals Opinion. Reifert v S Cent Wis MLS Corp (136k)

   

   

3.10: Passive Losses

  US Ct of Federal Claims Opinion. D'Avanzo v USA (106k).

    

   

3.11: Property "Flipping"

  MD Ct of Appeals Opinion. Hoffman v Stamper (222k).

    

   

3.12: Property Taxes

  MI Supreme Ct Opinion. Ford Motor Co v City of Woodhaven (195k).
  MI Ct of Appeals Opinion. Modzelewski v Wayne County Treasurer (89k).
  MI Ct of Appeals Opinion. Toll Northville v Twp of Northville (199k).

UPDATE! Upon appeal, the Michigan Supreme Court affirmed this ruling in a decision (154k) dated February 5, 2008.

  

   

3.13: Real Estate Transfer Taxes

  MI Ct of Appeals Opinion. Lake Forest Partners 2 Inc v Dep't of Treasury (156k).

UPDATE! The Michigan Supreme Court reversed this decision by Order (101k) dated February 1, 2008. The Court ruled that the transfer tax act taxes recorded instruments, and the only recorded instruments in this case were the deeds. Further the tax is based on the value exchanged for the deed. Because the deeds conveyed both the lots and the homes, Petitioner should have paid transfer taxes on the combined values.

  

Petitioner could have paid transfer taxes only on the lots if it had deeded the unimproved lots first, and then entered into separate agreements to construct the homes.

  

   

3.14: Seller Disclosure Act

  Seller's Disclosure Statement (23k)
  MI Ct of Appeals Opinion. Pena v Ellis (109k).

    

   

3.15: Separation of Powers

  MI Ct of Appeals Opinion. Pulte Land Co LLC v Alpine Twp (171k).

    

   

3.16: Subdivision Restrictions

  MI Ct of Appeals Opinion. Maus v Kniss (151k).

    

   

3.17: Tax Incentives for Businesses

  US Supreme Ct Opinion. DaimlerChrysler Corp v Cuno (302k).

    

   

3.18: Tax Reversion Notices

  US Supreme Ct Opinion. Jones v Flowers (330k).

    

   

3.19: Title Insurance Policies

  American Land Title Association (ALTA)
  MI Ct of Appeals Opinion. Boyadjiev v Transnation Title Ins Co (87k).

    

   

3.20: Wetlands

  US Supreme Ct Opinion. Rapanos v US (788k).
  US 6th Cir Ct of Appeals Opinion. Carabell v USACE (31k).
  US 6th Cir Ct of Appeals Opinion. US v Rapanos (161k).